Chapter 15 The English of Literature (III) –the Language of Drama
2) How do playwrights manipulate the naturalness of characters’s speech? Why?
Though drama is most like naturally occurring conversation, it is written to be spoken—it is prepared and rehearsed, which is not the case in daily life. However, real conversation and drama dialogue still share something in common, including the turn-taking patterns, speech act patterns, uses of conversational implicature ect. Interestingly, what is aimed at by playwrights is on
5) How does the particular politeness pattern of a person reveal his/ her traits?
It is well known that politeness is an imp
According to Brown and Levinson, positive and negative face exist universally in human culture. In social interactions, face-threatening acts are at times inevitable based on the terms of the conversation. A face threatening act is an act that inherently damages the face of the addressee or the speaker by acting in opposition to the wants and desires of the other. Most of these acts are verbal, however, they can also be conveyed in the characteristics of speech (such as tone, inflection, etc) or in non-verbal forms of communication. At minimum, there must be at least on
Take the following sentences to show the politeness pattern of a person.
a. Close the door. ( quite impolite, using a direct form of FTA)
b. Could you please close the door? (polite, asking for a favour)
c. It’s a bit draughty in here. ( appear not be coercive and avoid performing FTA)
In drama, the playwright may use the politeness strategies to make the drama dramatically interesting, which indicate characters’ relationship or social conflict.
Take Eugene Ionesco’s the lesson for example, the professor shows an excessive politeness to the pupil at the start of the private lesson, keeping apologizing and begging for forgiveness for keeping the pupil waiting. However, during the lesson and near the end of the lesson, the professor shows totally oppositive attitude toward the students, being very rude, discouraging and ordering them not to give the response. From the vivid contrast, we can clearly see the professor’s true colours- hypocritical, superficial, and even pretentious.
评论